BioEM 2023 Student platform sheet

Dear Examiners,

We would like to inform you about the important deadline for submitting score sheets.
It is crucial that all score sheets are submitted by 19:30 UK time on 22nd June 2023.
To submit your score sheets, please use the form below.

If you encounter any technical difficulties or require further assistance, please don’t hesitate to contact office@BioEM.org.

Please note that any score sheets received after the specified deadline may not be considered for evaluation, potentially impacting the overall results of the event.

Thank you in advance for your prompt attention to this matter.

We greatly appreciate your cooperation.

Best regards,

Awards Committee BioEM 2023

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.

Examiner Information

Examiner Name

Examiner email

Abstract Information

Presenter name

Abstract ID

Poster: On the right corner

Is presenter attending?

If NO, then do NOT score this presentation and inform office@bioem.org

Conflict of interest

Are you from the same department?

If YES, then do NOT score this presentation and inform office@bioem.org

In the previous 3 years, have you published together with the first or last author?

If YES, then do NOT score this presentation and inform office@bioem.org

Presentations

Quality of slides and appropriateness

Did the student engage the audience using good volume, pace, articulation & use of gestures? Was the student's demeanor appropiate for a scientific talk?

Did the student present the work in clear, understandable language?

Was the time limit respected?

Scientific Content

Did the presentation include the appropriate components (i.e., introduction, purpose, hypothesis, methods, results, conclusion, & future work)?

Were the concept, importance, and result of the research adequately described?

Did the conclusion address the hypothesis or objective of the research?

Scientific Quality

How original was the research?

Questions

Were the questions interpreted correctly, i.e., were they understood?

Were the questions answered correctly and clearly, i.e., without technical jargon?

Was the student given ample opportunity by the chair to answer questions?

If NO please explain:

Comments